{"id":4621,"date":"2020-02-19T16:05:46","date_gmt":"2020-02-19T15:05:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dev.inkovema.de\/?p=4621"},"modified":"2021-01-01T22:48:01","modified_gmt":"2021-01-01T21:48:01","slug":"maps-of-mediation-1-riskins-grid","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dev.inkovema.de\/en\/blog\/maps-of-mediation-1-riskins-grid\/","title":{"rendered":"Maps of Mediation (1 of 3) – Riskins Grid"},"content":{"rendered":"

Riskin's Grid <\/b><\/h1>\n

Maps of mediation (1 of 3)<\/b><\/h2>\n

I. Introduction<\/h3>\n

The one<\/i> Mediation does not exist.<\/p>\n

There are a variety of ways to mediate between conflicting parties in the role of a third party, to support them in their efforts to reach a settlement and to find solutions to the conflicting situation together. Although there are a multitude of possibilities, they nevertheless take place within frames of reference that are based on Basic assumptions and basic patterns<\/strong> <\/em>based.<\/p>\n

Example: Mediators generally assume that conflicts are not fated or ordained by God, but are caused by human beings and can therefore be shaped. Only on this basis does it make sense for the parties to the conflict (together with a third party) to consider together what can be done constructively.<\/em><\/p>\n

Certain basic assumptions and patterns mean that there are clusters between all the personal mediation styles of mediators, mediation styles that are similar and have a certain Type of mediation style<\/strong> <\/em>result.<\/p>\n

In our small Series „Maps of Mediation“\u00a0<\/strong><\/em>is precisely about providing models and overviews that formulate and to a certain extent present the order and structures of mediation styles, their clusters and typical manifestations. After all, it is not that easy to observe different mediation styles (confidentiality of the process!). But a lot of research work will (be able to) remedy this situation.<\/p>\n

II Maps of mediation<\/h3>\n

In our short series on mediation styles, we present three maps that illustrate and explain the differences and similarities.<\/p>\n

The Prelude<\/strong> forms the map of\u00a0Leonard Riskin<\/em><\/strong>an American lawyer and mediator, who in the 1990s presented a grid that takes up the two important dimensions of problem definition and mediator role.<\/p>\n

In the next two articles on the maps of mediation, we will discuss the\u00a0Meta-model of mediation by Nadja Alexander<\/strong>\u00a0<\/i>and the\u00a0Basic ideas of mediation<\/strong>\u00a0<\/em>in more depth under the aspect of mediation styles.<\/p>\n<\/div>

<\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>

Small series of articles on the maps of mediation styles<\/h3>\n<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/i><\/span>Maps of Mediation (1\/3) – Riskin's Grid (1997\/2003)<\/span><\/a><\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/i><\/span>Maps of mediation (2\/3) – Alexander's meta-model of mediation<\/span><\/a><\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/i><\/span>Maps of mediation (3\/3) – Based on the basic ideas of mediation<\/span><\/a><\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>

III Riskin's grid<\/h3>\n

The model by Leonard Riskin, an American law professor and mediator, is no longer entirely new, but is more than tried and tested. two dimensions<\/strong> <\/em>mediative action:<\/p>\n